You're
right – "the way is narrow"
–
And
"difficult the Gate" –
And
"few there be" – Correct again –
That
"enter in – thereat" –
'Tis
Costly – So are purples!
'Tis
just the price of Breath –
With
but the "Discount" of the Grave –
Termed
by the Brokers – "Death"!
And
after that –
there's Heaven –
The
Good
Man's – "Dividend" –
And
Bad
Men – "go to Jail"
–
I
guess –
F249
(1861) 234
Dickinson
discusses the road to Heaven with either a religious person or perhaps even
Jesus himself. Referring to a sermon Jesus reportedly gave,* she agrees that
the way to Heaven is narrow and difficult, but seems to stop short of
concurring that there is any punishment – Hell – for those who aren’t good
enough to stay on the right road. Her tone is breezy and dismissive, even
sarcastic. She adopts the language of commerce, as if life is an investment
aided by brokers and paying off with dividends. The price of life, or “Breath,”
is costly – but, hey, there is this great Death discount! You won’t have to pay
forever!
I feel sorry for the people on the wrong narrow path. Maybe they are heretics. They are cruelly disppointed to end up in the same nasty place as the great throng of sinners. |
The
dismissive sarcastic tone begins with the aside, “Correct again.” Today we
might say, “Yep, it’s a tough road and that gate’s a toughie. Check. And you
say that hardly anyone makes it in? Bingo.” Why is Dickinson so dismissive
here? It seems she is skeptical of the ultimate destination and purpose. Life
itself is “Costly,” she implies – like buying the sort of clothes royalty might
wear with its expensive purple dyes. Just being born incurs the cost of living,
“the price” – again the financial lingo – “of Breath.” The “Brokers” – those men who claim knowledge and
authority – are the clergy who dispense their knowledge. It is again sarcasm when she notes that
another word for their “Discount” on the cost of life’s difficult investment is
“Death.”
The
last stanza summarily dismisses the dual destinations of Heaven, a “Dividend”
for the good, and Hell, or “Jail” where the “Bad men” go, with a shrug: “I
guess.” “Yeah, whatever,” we might say. Sure.
The
poem sounds to me like a response to a sermon where the clergyman made the
extended analogy she discusses: life as a costly investment, heaven as a
dividend, and a punitive place for the miscreants.
As
far as meter, the poem hums along in iambic trimeter with the third line of
each stanza iambic tetrameter. But then to add emphasis, the last line, “I guess
– ,” that retrospectively embues the whole poem with such irony, is separated from the line before.
Without this emphatic separation, the line would have been another 3rd
line iambic tetrameter. There is a “missing” last line, a purposeful omission
that leaves the doubt hanging midair. The poet is unresolved on the issue and
so is the poem.
* ‘Enter ye in by the narrow gate:
for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many
there be that enter in thereby. For narrow is the gate and straitened is the
way that leadeth into life, and few be they that find it” (Matthew 7:13-14).
No comments on a death poem after 11 years? Is death something we don’t talk about? Is 'You're right' too simplistic, not worth comment? Too preachy? Contagious or fatal? Heretical??
ReplyDeleteSusan K’s explication punches the bull’s eye dead center – writing’s clear, convincing, complete. ED’s withering sarcasm forces me to think “resolved”, not “unresolved”, in the explication’s last line.
I really love this poem
ReplyDelete