The
Flower must not blame the Bee –
That
seeketh his felicity
Too
often at her door –
But
teach the Footman from Vevay –
Mistress
is "not at home" – to say –
To
people – any more!
F235
(1861) 206
That
pesky Bee, always seeking his “felicity” from the lovely Flower’s nectars. He
must be politely turned away and discouraged. But oh what a difference a year
makes! In “Did the harebell loose its girdle” (1860), the harebell was
definitely considering helping her “lover Bee” out. But even then, the question
lingered about whether or not the little scamp could respect her in the morning.
And
wasn’t it only thirty poems ago in “Come slowly – Eden!” that the bee was
humming around the flower’s “chambers” only to enter – apparently with no muss
or fuss about it – and become “lost in balms”?
This
poem is decidedly cooler. In very formal diction the flower is instructed not
to “blame the Bee” because he is by nature out for pleasure, even if it means
making a pest of himself calling at the door of his “Flower.” The Flower isn’t
some casual forest gentian or daisy lolling about on a stream bank. This flower
is quite proper and even has a “Footman from Vevay” – a famous resort location on
Lake Geneva, Switzerland. The Footman might be assumed to be a cool
professional. Dickinson has associated Switzerland with a certain cool
aloofness before in “Our lives are Swiss – / So still –so Cool – .”
The footman is given explicit instructions: Tell the Bee that I am ‘not at home
… / “To people – anymore.”
At
first the bee would be crestfallen. Mistress not receiving anyone?? But here’s
the double take: Mistress isn’t home to ‘people’ anymore. But what about bees??
Is that an intentional loophole?
I
find this a very playful way of pushing the lover away with one hand while
beckoning him with the other. If the bee is smart he’ll find the back door and
dodge the snooty Footman. Before too long he too might “count his nectars” (“Come
slowly – Eden!”).
The bee has to dodge this guy |
Just found this . Fabulous idea. How do I find #1,#2, etc.? (Thank You!)
ReplyDeleteYou can either use the search bar (below the header) or else just go back in time using the Blog Archive. Welcome to the Blog!
DeleteThank You for your Welcome and your Blog! I just commented on Fr449 as "Anonymous." I don't know how to identify myself under "Select profile." I'm new to computers, blogs, etc.
DeleteI'm not sure as I don't get that option. I went to another blogspot.com website to see, and it recognized me. I assume that because blogspot is a Google service and I have a Google profile that it recognizes me. So you can either set up a Google profile (through gmail, Google+, etc.) -- or simply sign your name if you prefer to not be Anonymous!
DeleteThank You once again - I just now found your message! ( Not too good at this. ) Tom Boring
ReplyDeleteSusan, your comment is delightful, insightful, especially that cleverly disguised loophole. In Line 2 ED's cleverly disguised pronoun, unmasked, reveals identities of Flower and Bee. ED's 1864 letter-poem to Sue (L288) skips disguise:
ReplyDeleteSweet Sue,
There is
no first, or last,
in Forever -
It is Centre, there,
all the time -
To believe - is enough,
and the right of
supposing -
Take back that
"Bee" and "Buttercup"
I have no Field
for them, though
for the Woman
whom I prefer,
Here is Festival -
………