'Tis Living — hurts us more —
But Dying — is a different way —
A kind behind the Door —
The Southern Custom — of the Bird —
That ere the Frosts are due —
Accepts a better Latitude —
We — are the Birds — that stay.
The Shiverers round Farmers' doors —
For whose reluctant Crumb —
We stipulate — till pitying Snows
Persuade our Feathers Home.
F528
(1863) J335
For a little context on the poem I'm
borrowing David Preest's
excellent introduction to it:
This poem ends a letter (L278) Emily wrote to her cousins, Louise and FrancesNorcross, on the death of their father on 7 January 1863. She is at her tenderest in condolence letters such as this and in another letter (L279) written to her cousins a week or so later. In the first letter she tactfully asks them, ‘Wasn’t dear papa so tired always after mamma went, and wasn’t it almost sweet to think of the two together these winter nights? The grief is our side, darlings, and the glad is theirs.’ …. And she ends the letter with these words which lead into the poem, ‘Good-night. Let Emily sing for you because she cannot pray.
I find those final
words quite moving. The poem is like a song. Written in hymn form (alternating
iambic tetrameter and trimeter lines in quatrains), you could sing it quite
easily to the tune of "Amazing Grace". Like a good hymn, it is a very
visual poem. We can see the newly dead finding a hidden path behind the door
between life and death. Then, shifting back to this world, we see the cold and
hopeful birds hanging about a farmhouse. We imagine the farmer tossing out a scanty
handful of crumbs from time to time, the birds swooping down hungrily from
nearby trees.
The last quatrain is
an anti-prayer from the poet who "cannot pray". Over-wintering birds may hover around praying for crumbs, but it is ultimately the soft, lovely,
lethal snow that comes to them – to us – unbidden. Prayer might bring crumbs,
but the true home, the "better Latitude", is what we should aim for.
Those who stay behind hoping for the farmers' largesse seem pitiful to us and also, it would seem, to the delivering "pitying Snows".
We have seen both the
niggardly crumb and the ease of snow in earlier poems. In “Victory comes late” (F195)
the speaker bitterly complains about dining on crumbs. There the table of
plenty is Victory and it is God who keeps it out of reach. Those yearning for
its bounty must “dine on tiptoe". "Was God so economical?" the
poet asks, and the same question might be asked of the farmer so stingy with
his crumbs.
In contrast, the snow seems
generous. Dickinson has used snow imagery in several ways – as purity, leaves
of poetry, steadfastness, and death. As a metaphor for death, it presages
spring and rebirth; it is "that
long town of White – to cross – / Before the Blackbirds sing!" (F265).
In F372,
"After great pain, a formal feeling comes –", we see a snow death:
"First – Chill – then Stupor – then the letting go –". While at first
there is cold and growing stupefaction, there is finally the assent to snow's
persuasion, a gentle letting go.
The last line of the
poem reminds me of "A Bird came down the Walk" (F359)
where the poet offers a bird a crumb (not at all reluctantly). The bird is too
wary to accept, however, "And he unrolled his feathers / And rowed him
softer Home –". The image here, as in the poem under discussion, is of a gentle
ending. The bird's trip "Home" is as soft as butterflies leaping
"plashless" off "Banks of Noon". The snow is likewise soft:
it persuades without ruffling a feather.
And who but Dickinson could phrase death as "Persuade our Feathers
Home"? It's a beautiful image that at once engages the association of bird
with spirit as well as home with heaven. As a consolatory poem the ending is
exceedingly lovely and gracious.
As a final thought on
Dickinson's statement that she cannot pray, she covered that ground a couple of
poems ago in "My period had come for Prayer –" (F525). Although she felt an urgent need to pray, she
realized that the God to whom she was trying to speak was nowhere to be found.
Instead, she found "Vast Prairies of Air", Infinitude, Silence, and
Creation. Her epiphany was that prayer was perhaps irrelevant, that to confront
the Silence is to enter into worship.
I like this poem more each time I read it. I can't add anything to your excellent commentary -- except to echo your comments about "Persuade our Feathers Home". So beautiful -- and so compassionate.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of only 3 sites out of about 22 Google search's that has used the correct noun, shiverers, in line 9 of the poem. All others have used "shrivers".
ReplyDeleteWho are their editors? Dr. and Mrs. Cutnpaste. Sad. Sad.
I cut and paste from Wiki, then copy edit from Franklin. It's true -- the Wiki version had 'shrivers'. Had to laugh.
DeleteThank you for your insightful commentaries on Emily's poetry. Always intelligent, profound and inspiring.
ReplyDeleteBest Regards.
Thank you so much, Helena!
DeleteWhat are the themes of this poem basically? if you can guide i will be very grateful to you
ReplyDeleteIt's urgent
How different can two consecutive poems be? ED herself sewed ‘One Anguish — in a Crowd’ (F527) and ‘Tis not that Dying hurts us so’ (F528) back to back, 3rd and 4th , into Fascicle 28.
ReplyDeletePrivately she’s a doe attacked by a “Swarm” of “Hounds”,
“Tis Terror as consummate
As Legions of Alarm
Did leap, full flanked, upon the Host —”,
waiting to be ripped to shreds,
“A Being — impotent to end —
When once it has begun —”.
Publicly, for her “precious little cousins” (L278), she bids “Good-night. Let Emily sing for you”,
“We — are the Birds — that stay.
The Shiverers round Farmers' doors —
For whose reluctant Crumb —
We stipulate — till pitying Snows
Persuade our Feathers Home.”
How different can two consecutive poems be? Private “terror . . . consumate” versus public lullaby of reassuring hope. A really rare kind of courage, worthy of Frazar Stearns, who cheered his fellow soldiers into the teeth of death.