A Minor thing — it sounds —
And yet, unto the single Doe
Attempted of the Hounds
'Tis Terror as consummate
As Legions of Alarm
Did leap, full flanked, upon the Host —
'Tis Units — make the Swarm —
A Small Leech — on the Vitals —
The sliver, in the Lung —
The Bung out — of an Artery —
Are scarce accounted — Harms —
Yet might — by relation
To that Repealless thing —
A Being — impotent to end —
When once it has begun —
F527 (1863) J565
The poem uses two analogies to talk about suffering. The first stanza introduces the terrors of the individual person or doe: One individual's anguish shouldn't seem so bad: what is one sufferer among many who suffer not? The pain of one person amid a crowd can seem a "Minor thing" – perhaps there is an acceptable ratio. Dickinson then pivots to the image of a terrified doe, and while the two images are not parallel – the doe pursued by hounds seems nothing like an anguished human amid a crowd, I think Dickinson means us to see an anguished person as one set upon by metaphorical dogs of torment. The focus of the first stanza is on the terrorized human, not the doe.
The second stanza provides the analogy: the terror of this onslaught of torment is like that of an army, "the Host", suddenly attacked by a much greater force. The army is panicked and overwhelmed. The attacking soldiers, the "Units", are like the individual dogs in the hunting pack. The pack, the Legions, the "Swarm" are comprised of individuals, too, but these act en masse. The word "Swarm" is terrifying in itself here. One pictures the doe being pulled down and covered by the attacking bodies of dogs. One imagines a single army surprised, outnumbered, and likewise being cut down and covered by the swarm of attackers. One then sees the individual being cut down by invisible woes.
A Deer Chased by Dogs, by Jean-Baptiste Oudry, 1725 |
I don't particularly fancy this poem. The progression of images doesn't quite work. The overall idea of swarms of harm leading to misery, terror and death, isn't made new or fresh. Perhaps a reader will have a more interesting take on this poem.
I think she expresses the vulnerability of a violated woman within a culture reticent or unable to deal with the consequences of violence. Of course, I'm not suggesting that the poem is autobiographical. Rather that her profound empathy finds voice for the victims.
ReplyDeleteYou may well be right. I can certainly read it that way -- the pathos moves in the right direction.
Delete“Kornfield”? Ughh. I can only imagine what kind of twisted, perverse, subversion-aimed spin you’ve put on Emily’s poems.
ReplyDeletetitle for this poem
ReplyDelete“A Being — impotent to end —“, a “Repealless thing —“, defenseless as “Legions” of dogs “Swarm” over her.
ReplyDeleteSorry, but the “Being” wallows in self-pity, attacked, in her mind, by God and people. Today we call it paranoia.
Thank you Anonymous. May I retract Comment 11/6/2023 and replace it with:
DeletePerhaps paranoia. Perhaps making meaning out of madness. Nothing a good psychiatrist couldn’t fix, had there been one. Would she trade her poems for good mental health? Sorry, too late, done deal. And as Woody Allen said, "I need the eggs".
ED choreographed her funeral down to the hired help who relieved her gentry pallbearers just outside her Homestead door, toted her carcass around her garden, past Evergreens, and a quarter mile to Amherst West Cemetery. Not bad for a “partially cracked poetess” (Higginson, December 28, 1876).
In the first stanza, ED says something like this: To an onlooker, it may seem like no big deal to add one more anguish to the crowd of anxieties and fears that I already have to deal with. But to me, it is one anguish too many; it is overwhelming. It is like one more hound added to the pack that has been trying to hunt me down.
ReplyDeleteIt reminds me of what I've read in "The Simple Guide to Complex Trauma and Dissociation" by Betsy de Thierry.
"I often describe emotional reactivity simply with the example of thinking about when we stub our toe. If we are on holiday and we are happy and we stub our toe, we can be cross with the door and then quickly move on. When we are having a bad day, it can be the final straw and can cause us to question whether we should just give up and go home. Such is the life of a traumatised child; they are full of pain already and so a small, natural experience like stubbing their toe can lead to massive reactions that seem disproportionate to the small experience."
The "Repealless thing" in the last stanza is not death but that "Being" in the penultimate line, i.e., the poet, which is "impotent to end —/When once it has begun —." In F444 "It would have starved a Gnat —" Emily envies a gnat because he has "the Art/Upon the Window Pane/To gad [his] little Being out —/And not begin — again —."